I suspect this research study had no lack of willing participants on at least one side of the equation.
Major funding provided by the Foundation for Researching Things We Basically Knew but Were in No State to Remember.
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
It's great that someone has finally quantified this critically important phenomenon, but looking at the equation I wonder whether they've really isolated all the factors.
For instance, is there no difference between men and women? For that matter, what about sexual preference? Type of drink, setting (other than smokiness of the room), time of the year? It seems to me that these questions need to be answered before the formula can really be put to practical use.
2 comments:
It's great that someone has finally quantified this critically important phenomenon, but looking at the equation I wonder whether they've really isolated all the factors.
For instance, is there no difference between men and women? For that matter, what about sexual preference? Type of drink, setting (other than smokiness of the room), time of the year? It seems to me that these questions need to be answered before the formula can really be put to practical use.
I agree. This is clearly junk science (commissioned by Bausch & Lomb, no less).
Any fool knows you have to set a baseline for variable 'H', or "horniess."
Post a Comment